FROST v CHRISTINA TRUST | FL 4DCA – Given the many caveats in the PAA, Christiana Trust’s failure to prove that Chase actually purchased the Note, instead of simply acquiring the servicing rights, is fatal to its case

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ROBERT T. FROST a/k/a ROBERT FROST, Appellant, v. CHRISTIANA TRUST, a Division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee for Normandy Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2013-18, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., as Nominee for AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER, […]

Source: Stopforeclosurefraud – FROST v CHRISTINA TRUST | FL 4DCA – Given the many caveats in the PAA, Christiana Trust’s failure to prove that Chase actually purchased the Note, instead of simply acquiring the servicing rights, is fatal to its case

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *