FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, September 29, 2016 Branch Banking & Trust Company Agrees to Pay $83 Million to Resolve Alleged False Claims Act Liability Arising from FHA-Insured Mortgage Lending Branch Banking & Trust Company (BB&T) has agreed to pay the United States $83 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by […]
You might also like
In re: Sundquist v. Bank of America, NA | Bank of America Hit with $45 Million in Punitive Damages for Stay Violations
TFH 7/23 | Foreclosure Workshop #37: Rigby v. Bank of New York Mellon — The “Standing-at-Inception” Rule Versus the Question Whether “the Mortgage Follows the Note” or “the Note Follows the Mortgage”
Peters v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON | FL 2DCA – Because the Bank failed to prove its ownership of the lost note that it attempted to reestablish and enforce, we reverse
Foreclosure Workshop #22 (A Two-Hour Special with Guest Virginia Parsons): U.S. Bank, Trustee v. Mattos — A Case Study on How the Hawaii Supreme Court on September 15, 2016 While Conducting Oral Argument Confronted Some of the Most Important Present Issues in Securitized Trust Judicial Foreclosure Litigation.